<![CDATA[Maggie's Farm at Mulberry Creek More than a CSA - Gail\'s Blog: Contemplative Wanderer]]>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 12:38:33 -0400Weebly<![CDATA[March 3, 2019: The Transfiguration of Peter]]>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 14:25:50 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/march-3-2019-the-transfiguration-of-peterMessage shared at Brunswick UMC, Brunswick, Maine, 3/3/19

​I know that some of you, like I, were completely distracted by the events that took place during last weekend’s Special General Conference. I know that some of you, like I, were devastated at the outcome. I know that some of you were satisfied with that outcome. And I know that some of you didn’t even know what happened until the news hit every news outlet Tuesday evening and Wednesday morning. It is possible that some of you didn’t know until this morning. It is also possible that some of you don’t really care. But the future of our denomination and, by extension, this part of it is uncertain. 

When Pastor Sharon asked me to give today’s message, the Special General Conference was not on our minds. Instead, we were focused on today being Transfiguration Sunday. Listen now to the story from Luke’s Gospel:

Luke 9:28-36 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)
28 Now about eight days after these sayings Jesus took with him Peter and John and James, and went up on the mountain to pray. 29 And while he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became dazzling white. 30 Suddenly they saw two men, Moses and Elijah, talking to him. 31 They appeared in glory and were speaking of his departure, which he was about to accomplish at Jerusalem. 32 Now Peter and his companions were weighed down with sleep; but when they were fully awake, they saw his glory and the two men who stood with him. 33 Just as they were leaving him, Peter said to Jesus, “Master, it is good for us to be here; let us make three tents, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah”—not knowing what he said. 34 While he was saying this, a cloud came and overshadowed them; and they were terrified as they entered the cloud. 35 Then from the cloud came a voice that said, “This is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!” 36 When the voice had spoken, Jesus was found alone. And they kept silent and in those days told no one any of the things they had seen.

Oh, Peter! You never can stay awake while Jesus is praying, can you? I have faith in you, though, you’ll get it figured out.

Peter, the uneducated, rough fisherman also called Simon, who was so impetuous. When Jesus said, “Come on along,” along he went. He followed Jesus around Galilee watching as Jesus performed miracles, listening as Jesus taught, and, more often than not, failing to understand just who this Jesus really was. 

Peter was on fire for Jesus, though. Matthew’s Gospel includes the story of Peter impetuously jumping out of the boat to try walking on water, and nearly succeeding, I might add. 

Peter, as spokesperson for the disciples, is the one who answers when Jesus asks “Who do you say I am?”

That little conversation about Jesus identity comes right before the climb up the mountain in today’s reading. Within that conversation, in all four Gospels, Jesus also tells his disciples that they’re about to go to Jerusalem where he’s going to die. According to Matthew and Mark, Peter takes Jesus aside and says, “Don’t talk that way!” To which Jesus responds, “Listen, folks. I’m going to die. But since I’m actually God, I won’t stay dead. I will tell you this, though: if you continue to follow my Way, you’ll probably die, too.”

Peter didn’t get it. Of course he didn’t! We know the end of the story, don’t we? But that was all in the future for Peter. He continued to hold on to the hope that none of what Jesus predicted would really happen. I mean, really! Jesus is the Messiah we’ve all been waiting for! Everyone will be so excited and Jesus will ride into Jerusalem on his white horse, run out the Romans, and return Israel to the glory days of David’s Kingdom! Peter did not understand what Jesus was saying. He never did, did he? Giving Peter a little slack, the rest of the disciples had no clue, either.

So here we are, skipping happily down the road, and Jesus decides he needs a prayer retreat, not an uncommon occurrence, so climbs the nearest mountain taking his three besties along.

Jesus prays a lot. And he really gets into it. Peter and the boys fall asleep and miss a lot, as they tend to do. While they’re asleep, God’s prophets show up. This happens on mountains a lot in the first few books of the Old Testament, stories Peter, James, and John would have been very familiar with. So there they are on the mountain, Jesus is all glowy, and Moses and Elijah show up to have an encouraging chat with him about his impending death. Now me, with all that bright light suddenly turned on, I’d have woken right up. And the boys woke up, saw what was going on, and got really excited. Wow! Moses and Elijah! The two greatest prophets in history! Standing right here on this mountain talking to our Jesus! Wow! 

So Peter, impetuous Peter, wants to rebuild the Tabernacle right there on top of that mountain. Three, actually, one for each of these glowing figures. Just as he’s suggesting this to Jesus, God shows up in person but hidden within a cloud that covers the whole scene. The boys would have been familiar with the Exodus journey and God appearing from within a cloud. Be that as it may, this pretty much freaks them out. Then God speaks. “This is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!”

Jesus has heard this before, but the boys haven’t. Coming so soon after Peter had recognized Jesus as the Messiah, this was confirmation. But, as wild as this mountaintop experience has been, Peter still didn’t get the full picture.

As I said, we know the rest of the story … at least I assume it’s not a spoiler to say that things happened just as Jesus said they would. They got to Jerusalem and Jesus was killed. But not after some drama while they were celebrating a Passover meal at which Peter, always impulsive, vows to stick with Jesus no matter what. “Even if I have to die!” he proclaimed in Matthew’s and Mark’s versions. Then he found himself once again falling asleep while Jesus prayed out in the Garden. 

The next morning the rooster crowed, Peter was ashamed; then traumatized as his Messiah was hung on a cross to die. And, wonder of wonders, Peter was a witness to the empty tomb on Sunday morning. But Peter still didn’t get it, did he? 

The Gospels give us a confused picture of what happened after that but John tells us that at some point Peter headed home. Back to his fishing boat; back to the way things were before the excitement, the mountains and valleys; back to who he was before he denied his Messiah. But things could never be the way they were. Peter’s Transfiguration was well under way.

At some point after the Resurrection, after the Resurrected Christ had appeared to Peter individually and as part of groups, after Jesus commissioned Peter to “Feed my Sheep” (according to John), after the disciples had been commissioned to make disciples, after Jesus had ascended, after the disciples were trading between worshiping at the Temple and hiding out in fear, the next stage in Peter’s Transfiguration happened.

The power of the Holy Spirit blew in at Pentecost and, Acts 1:14 says, “Peter, standing with the eleven, raised his voice and addressed them.” Whoa Peter! Dude! Listen to you speak! Acts 1:41 tells us “and that day about three thousand persons were added.” The rugged fisherman had become the first mega-church preacher! He finally gets it! He’s experienced God’s power enough times now that it all comes together and Peter grasps what Jesus had been saying and doing!

The SALT class has been studying the book of Acts for the past several weeks so they can tell you what those crazy Christians, under Peter’s leadership, get up to over the next months. The Reader’s Digest version is that the Holy Spirit got folks fired up and the community grew exponentially. 

But Peter’s Transfiguration isn’t done yet. See, this early community was comprised of Jews. The Church was centered in Jerusalem and grew in an ever widening circle outward into Samaria then into the Diaspora, which is Greek for the Jewish communities outside Israel (and at that time it was Israel). The earliest Christians were Jews who believed that Jesus was their Messiah. 

Peter was the leader of the group. He’s not sleeping now! He’s having to lead the community in making decisions about leadership, about integrity, about participation. He’s having to help guide the church through the reality of Jesus’ prediction of persecution. He’s even having to travel around dealing with little issues that come up, overseeing miraculous healings and the occasional resurrection, as you do.

And the Word is spreading. It’s not long before those outside the Jewish community start to take notice and become drawn in. First come those called “God-fearers” who were non-Jews who believed in and worshiped the Jewish God. 

But then Romans started becoming interested in becoming a part of this movement. Acts chapter 10 tells the story of a Roman Centurion named Cornelius who was stationed in Caesarea, a Roman city not far from Jerusalem. Cornelius was one of those God-fearers and during his prayers one afternoon, God spoke to him. Wait – what?!? God spoke to a Roman! God directed Cornelius to send someone over to another town, several miles away, to fetch Peter back. 

Listen to this from Acts 10: 

9 About noon the next day, as they (the messengers from Cornelius) were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. 10 He became hungry and wanted something to eat; and while it was being prepared, he fell into a trance. 11 He saw the heaven opened and something like a large sheet coming down, being lowered to the ground by its four corners. 12 In it were all kinds of four-footed creatures and reptiles and birds of the air. 13 Then he heard a voice saying, “Get up, Peter; kill and eat.” 14 But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is profane or unclean.” 15 The voice said to him again, a second time, “What God has made clean, you must not call profane.” 16 This happened three times, and the thing was suddenly taken up to heaven. … 19 While Peter was still thinking about the vision, the Spirit said to him, “Look, three men are searching for you. 20 Now get up, go down, and go with them without hesitation; for I have sent them.”

The messengers show up; Peter, along with several friends, goes with them over to Cornelius’s place; and, greeting ritual taken care of, Peter says, 

28…“You yourselves know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or to visit a Gentile; but God has shown me that I should not call anyone profane or unclean.”

Peter, the righteous Jew who has sat at the feet of the greatest Jewish Rabbi of all time, the leader of the Jewish sect called Christians, has been Transfigured! He preaches to everyone at Cornelius’s place, which included Cornelius and his extended family as well as his friends, who would all have been Romans, as well as the group who had traveled there with Peter, who would all have been Jews. It sounds like quite a crowd was there. 

44 While Peter was still speaking, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard the word. 45 The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astounded that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on the Gentiles, 46 for they heard them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter said, 47 “Can anyone withhold the water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”

This New and Improved Transfigured Peter has received, directly from God, new instructions about who was welcome in the young Christian community. This is the moment that Christianity stopped being a Jewish sect. This is the moment God used an object lesson to teach Peter that his tent wasn’t big enough. 

Peter was the leader of the Church in Jerusalem and that’s where several of the earliest leaders hung out. They heard about all this with Cornelius and called Peter on the carpet about it. “What do you think you’re doing?!? Those Gentiles are incompatible with God’s teachings!”

Peter told them the whole story. All about the vision he had, how God had sent him to Cornelius, how he had preached and the Holy Spirit had gifted the Gentiles gathered. Peter closed this speech by saying:

11:17 If then God gave them the same gift that he gave us when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could hinder God?” 
18 When [the other apostles] heard this, they were silenced. And they praised God, saying, “Then God has given even to the Gentiles the repentance that leads to life.”

Unfortunately, the matter wasn’t settled. See, Peter convinced the apostles that God welcomed Gentiles into the Church. But their understanding carried an if. A big IF. If the believing Gentiles got circumcised and became Jewish, they could be part of the Church, which was still understood by the Church itself to be a Jewish sect. But this story ain’t over. No, not by a long shot.

See, there’s this other guy, you may have heard of him … name of Paul. He spent a fair amount of time traveling around the Greco-Roman world and everywhere he went, poof, Christian communities popped up! Then he’d move on to the next town. When he left, someone had to stay and lead. Someone had to stay and preach the message of Christ’s Gospel. It doesn’t take much math to figure out that, given the fact that most of the synagogues Paul encountered threw him out on his ear, these folks who were leading those small Christian Churches were, surprise! Gentiles. I don’t know who the first Gentile preacher was – the record is not clear. But Paul names a bunch of different men AND women in his letters who led their different churches; some are named in Acts. 

Paul visits the apostles in Jerusalem with his buddy Barnabas and they proceed to make a report of all the awesome growth they’ve seen, how many people have become followers of Christ, all the places they’ve been and lives they’ve seen changed. It’s amazing! Unfortunately, once more, the Jerusalem leadership gets their pants in a wad over Paul’s disobedience to their interpretation of God’s law and God’s will. A tremendous argument ensues. 

Then Peter steps to the microphone. A hush falls upon the room. The other leaders know Bishop Peter is going to put Paul in his place. Peter says:

15:7 “My [friends], you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that I should be the one through whom the Gentiles would hear the message of the good news and become believers. 8 And God, who knows the human heart, testified to them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as he did to us; 9 and in cleansing their hearts by faith he has made no distinction between them and us. 10 Now therefore why are you putting God to the test by placing on the neck of the disciples a yoke that neither our ancestors nor we have been able to bear? 11 On the contrary, we believe that we will be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will.”

The stunned leadership take a vote and decide to update their Book of Discipline. They then send out a letter that ends with these words:

28 “… it has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to impose on you no further burden than these essentials: 29 that you abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols and from blood and from fornication. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well. Farewell.”

Huh. Three requirements. Don’t eat anything that has been sacrificed to idols (which would violate the first two Commandments), don’t consume blood (which was understood to be the very life force), and don’t fornicate (which translated meant “faithful in marriage and celibate in singleness”).

Today is Transfiguration Sunday. We might want to dwell on Jesus’ Transfiguration on top of that mountain the way Peter wanted to build tents. But I think Peter’s Transfiguration is far more interesting and challenging for us. His journey from the fishing boat to the pulpit is one we can all emulate. 

There are some who say that everything about Peter in Acts was made up because no uneducated fisherman could preach well enough to inspire thousands to follow a dead Messiah, or be wise enough to lead the earliest Christians through trial and tribulation. Have you met Glenn? Because of dyslexia, he was nearly illiterate at the age of 35 but by the time he was 45 he had earned not one, but two masters degrees and by the time he was 55 his leadership had nearly doubled the attendance of several churches.

So don’t sell anyone short. Don’t any of us try to do God’s job in deciding who is and who isn’t qualified for Christian witness. God has given us two commandments: love God, and love neighbor. Everything else is between you and God.

This past week has left a lot of bodies. Our Global Church has already seen a huge loss. Already some have left the connection, both individuals and churches. Others, even annual conferences and one entire Jurisdiction, have boldly stated that the changes are unWesleyan and against the principles of our theology and they have no intention of obeying such unjust laws. Still others, probably the majority, actually, have a wait and see attitude. Many churches are saying to their people that who we are, what we do, has not changed and will not change. This local church, the people we know and love, are the people we know and love. God’s love hasn’t changed. We haven’t changed. Our mission hasn’t changed. Let’s wait and see. Some will ultimately choose to leave, some will choose to stay. That’s the way it always is. 

I have no idea what will happen. Will the Judicial Council rule enough of the Traditional Plan unconstitutional that there’s little change to our Discipline? I don’t know. Will we have a huge, ugly split or will the splintering be quieter? Again, I don’t know. Will this group or that group leave the denomination to start something new? Almost certainly, but which will swerve first in this game of ecclesiological chicken is hard to say at this point. 

What I do know is this: God loves us. All of us. And God calls us to love one another. I admit that I’m having a hard time loving some of us right now, but I’m working on it and I’m trusting God’s help. 

I want to be a Christian like Peter. Peter was willing to accept a completely different way of understanding God’s will. May I be as willing.
I like to finish up by giving out homework called Action Steps.

Action Steps:

1. This week, spend some time with Peter’s story as it’s told through the Gospels and Acts. Reflect on how Peter’s journey may apply to your own life.

2. I invite you to reach out to someone this week who is impacted by the General Conference decision. Share stories, hopes, fears. Pray together. If you’re brave enough, reach out to someone on the other side of the aisle. We need each other, Church.

3. This morning you have the opportunity to respond to Christ immediately. Some of you may feel hurt at the results of our General Conference or from something else. Some of you may feel angry. Some of you may feel smug. Soon we will be sharing together in Holy Communion. At that time, as always, you are welcome to spend some time at the altar. There will also be the opportunity to receive healing prayer. Simply come to the station where I will be. You may share a specific request for healing for you or on behalf of someone, or you may decide to say nothing at all. 

John Wesley, founder of the Methodist Movement from which this church descends, said these words as his last: “The best of all is God is with us.”
Let’s pray.

SOURCES: 
The Bible by God
]]>
<![CDATA[February 23, 2019: Some Last Thoughts on Leviticus]]>Sat, 23 Feb 2019 14:26:44 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-23-2019-some-last-thoughts-on-leviticusPicture
Leviticus is the center of the Torah, Pentateuch in Greek, the first five books of the Bible. Sometimes called the Books of Moses because he is the main character in all but one of them, a very recent tradition attributes the writing of these books to Moses, but they were almost certainly comprised of a number of oral traditions handed down through the generations, embellished or edited according to the current context, and finally written down during the Babylonian Exile as an explanation of “how we got where we are, the hope we have in a future out of exile, and how to keep this from happening again.” That was a really long sentence.

Genesis is the foundation narrative that details the beginnings of the people who would come to be called Israel: the Patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the key figure of Joseph, and the relocation of the people to Exodus. 

Exodus begins the saga of Moses and his leadership of the people as they escape from Egypt and begin life as a covenant people under YHWH. The book includes not just the escape from Egyptian slavery, but also a lengthy encampment at Mount Sinai (somewhere in the Arabian Peninsula) in which the covenant with YHWH is organized under a tribal structure with formal religious ritual for maintaining that covenant. 

At the end of Exodus, the people have constructed the Tabernacle and are ready to embark on the journey out of the wilderness into the Promised Land where they will become their own nation. The book of Numbers begins there, with the organization of the tribes as they are to travel and camp on that journey. Leviticus breaks that story line and is largely a collection of assorted laws and rituals written as instructions for going forward. However, it is clear from the way these laws and rituals are written that they were composed centuries later during exile more as explanations of “why we do the things we do” and “what we did wrong that got us into this pickle”. Leviticus is placed after Exodus as additional laws handed down on Mt. Sinai.  

Hear me: I’m not saying that this was made up out of whole cloth during the Babylonian Exile. But a people in a dire situation will look back and apply hindsight to seek reasons for their current circumstances. We do it all the time. “I’m in a lousy X situation because I didn’t see Y but looking back it should have been clear.” The Israelites having been conquered and driven from their Promised Land had to come to terms with how their God let this happen. Clearly, they must have done something wrong. 

To read the Bible as a history textbook is not only to misinterpret it, it is also to do a disservice to the Bible, to the people called Israel, to God, and to ourselves. This was not written to record a factual history, but to tell a faith story – the relationship between a people and their God, good bad and ugly. This People was comprised of millions spread over hundreds of square miles with differing traditions. There were, therefore, a number of different story-lines and explanations. As one tiny example, one tradition places the Tabernacle outside of the camp while another places it in the center of the camp. The precise location of the Tabernacle (as well as the exact roles and rituals which also differ somewhat from one tradition to another) is far less important than its role of contact with the Divine. Likewise, the exact individual laws are of far less importance than the overarching theme of Covenantal Love of God and Love of Neighbor that is interwoven throughout the narrative. Worshiping only YHWH and not idols. Keeping the Sabbaths. Honoring family, neighbors, and strangers. Being fair and just. And why those things are important to maintain that Covenant. 

We do tend to get distracted by individual leaves (laws) and miss the entire forest (Covenant). We focus on the leaves of a single tree (i.e. sex) and completely ignore other trees entirely (i.e. diet, community, rest). We forget that the Christian perspective on the Old Testament is much different from the Jewish. We forget to apply what Jesus said and did to these laws: he focused on that overarching theme of Love of God and Love of Neighbor. We forget the example of the early  Church, for instance Peter’s vision in Acts 8 in which all things previously unclean are  now clean, with animals being symbolic. We misinterpret individual stories written within and for a particular context and try to apply them to our current context, for instance Paul’s railing against pagan practices (temple prostitution in particular) in ways that were as clear as glass to his original audience but are less so to today’s. 

We need to read these stories, and stories they are, for what they can teach us about our faith history and about God’s desire for relationship. In the beginning God created humankind as companions. That purpose has not changed. By giving us the freedom to make choices, God allows us to choose to be divine companions … or not. God’s expectations and requirements are simple: Love God. Love neighbor. Period. There is no room in this covenant relationship for hate.

]]>
<![CDATA[February 18-22, 2019: Leviticus 16-27, “The Holiness Code”]]>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:03:33 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-18-22-2019-leviticus-16-27-the-holiness-codeThere are a lot of chapters to cover, but I’m behind in posting so I’ll try to keep it brief. I’m also including in the following generalization a few chapters beyond where my posting date has us.

First of all, chapter 16 details the Day of Atonement, now called Yom Kippur. It seems as if at first this was an emergency occasional ritual used in extreme cases as in the defilement by Nadab and Abihu. At some point it became an annual event with the apparent purpose of providing a general cleansing of any impurity that may have been overlooked over the course of the year. 

This is likely the origination the idea of the high priest entering the Holy of Holies only once per year. It’s also where we get the poor goat that has been traditionally translated as “scapegoat”, although the Hebrew is more ambiguous and may be referring to some kind of desert dwelling demon named Azazel. Who knows. And it doesn’t matter. These days no one talks about a desert demon but that scapegoat is alive and well.
So Leviticus 17-26 have come to be called the Holiness Code. Why? It has less to do with the contents and more to do with the authorship and style of writing. Again, these scriptures were compiled from a number of oral traditions. Most of this section rehashes material that has already been covered, some quite extensively, but some is unique. The entire thing deals with, again, keeping the community holy, especially the priests, so that bad things won’t happen by impurities spilling into the Tabernacle and triggering divine destruction. The phrase “I Am YHWH” appears numerous times as does some variant of the phrase “You shall be holy because I the Lord am holy”.

I’ll just gloss over some key points. 

Each of the Ten Commandments get covered in one form or another more than once and the annual festivals are again detailed. 

Holiness seems to be defined as being different from the surrounding cultures, particularly in ritual practices as well as in treatment of various subgroups. 

A great emphasis is placed on treatment of aliens (people outside the community but living within it). 

There is a higher standard of holiness expected of priests in general and the High Priest in particular. 

Of course anyone who has been paying attention to the news at all over the past thirty years knows there lists of prohibitions, some of which get more attention than they are warranted (20:13) while others of significantly more weight are virtually ignored (Sabbath keeping as only one example). Again, we cannot just pick isolated verses of scripture to hold up as moral guides and ignore the vast swaths of other texts, including other isolated texts. If you want to use Leviticus to condemn homosexuality, you must also condemn adultery, tattoos, taking interest, shellfish, bacon, and tennis shoes. You also have to own the fact that no where is lesbianism mentioned. 

The fact is, again, that folks get their undies in a wad over scriptures describing practices they personally find icky and ignore or rationalize away those they regularly practice. We would do well to stop arguing over homosexuality and start paying more attention to practices that REALLY piss God off like neglecting hospitality to foreigners and not keeping sabbath. 
]]>
<![CDATA[February 16-17, 2019: Leviticus 11-15, In Which God Steps on Toes]]>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:09:47 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-16-17-2019-exodus-11-15-in-which-god-steps-on-toesChapters 11-15 is a lengthy treatise on how to keep from becoming unclean and what to do if uncleanness happens. It’s all about maintaining holiness. In 11:44-45, God’s statement, “you shall be holy because I am holy” is the keystone to understanding all these prohibitions and weird rituals. Remember, God’s presence is highly dangerous and the sanctuary (Tabernacle) must be kept free of contamination at all times to keep from inadvertently causing divine destruction. It’s really as if there are just certain automatic results. So the people have to be super careful. So far, the rules aren’t too difficult to deal with … at least for the ancient Israelites.

For 21st century Americans, on the other hand, God’s stepping on toes! Again, if we decide that certain verses in Leviticus apply, then *all* verses in Leviticus apply. We cannot cherry pick what we like and ignore what we don’t. Everyone does this, by the way. We all have what’s called a “canon within the canon”. 

The first section within these chapters deals with clean and unclean animals for food. The concern was still over keeping impurity out of the community and therefore out of the Tabernacle. There is no way of knowing the complete rationale behind why this particular group of animals would be classified as unclean because the text does not say. Scholars have been debating and speculating over this for years with no one coming up with anything.

As always, edible vs. inedible animals are divided into three categories: land, water, and air. Land animals that are considered edible must have cleft hooves and be ruminants, whether they’re domestic (cattle, sheep, goats) or wild (antelope). The “not good to eat” animals aren’t taboo in and of themselves while they’re alive, but can’t be eaten. For instance horses – many cultures eat horse meat, they have hooves, and are ruminants. But their hooves are not cloven like cattle so they’re off limits. Sorry to everyone who loves bacon or ham or pork chops – they’re detestable. Water animals can only be fish. Too bad for connoisseurs of shrimp, lobster, scallops, clams, mussels, oysters … And no shark, either, because sharks don’t have scales. As for air animals, pretty much all birds are ok except scavengers, and you can replace your shrimp with grasshoppers and crickets. 

These unclean foods are all detestable. The Hebrew word used here is a synonym for the word translated elsewhere as abomination. That’s all that needs to be said about that.

So the next section deals with animals that are clean and unclean in and of themselves. These are *so* unclean you aren’t allowed to have them, never mind eat them, and you certainly can’t have any contact with the carcass of one! This list of awful animals includes anything with paws, so, sorry cat and dog lovers, they’ve gotta go. Next is anything that swarms, which is the best translation for the Hebrew and thankfully the text provides a helpful list so we know we need to rid our pet collection of any kind of lizard or small rodent. Snakes come in a few verses later. 

So we’re talking about dead bodies here, primarily. Anyone or anything who touches the dead body of any animal, clean or unclean, has to go through a modest purification ritual that evening in order to be restored to a state of cleanliness. An interesting aside is this: say an animal dies and falls into the well. Amazingly, the water is not rendered unclean and is fit to drink in spite of the fact that the same dead animal falling onto your soup pot renders it unclean. There are clearly elements of all this that we will never understand.

Chapter 11 ends with the bottom line: the Israelites must go to great lengths to maintain holiness because God is holy. 

Chapter 12 is a short piece concerning women’s need for purification after childbirth. We can only guess at why there are differences between the requirements for purification after the births of male vs. female children. However, there is an interesting note that bears mentioning because it is often overlooked: during their days of impurity after giving birth, women are not allowed in the sanctuary. This implies that they can and do enter the sanctuary at any other time. Again, the text tells us that women, not just men, were actively involved in serving God in the Tabernacle. 

Chapter 13 addresses with great detail and length a number of ways people and things can become defiled through various fungi or molds and how to become purified. Note that the priests are not serving here as doctors: they’re simply clarifying what’s a condition that renders a person or thing impure and therefore dangerous to the holy state of the community and, by extension, Tabernacle. Such persons could not even live within the community, though they were not sent away. They had to reside outside the bounds of the camp so as to not infect someone else with their condition and spread the impurity.

The traditional translation here of leprosy is completely wrong. The skin conditions described are not Hansen’s disease (leprosy): fabric and stone can’t get leprosy, the symptoms described are not the symptoms of leprosy, and people don’t recover from leprosy as described. Besides that, there is no archaeological or textual evidence that this was present in the Ancient Near East. The skin conditions described sound more like bad cases of acne or rash, perhaps eczema, psoriasis, or vitiligo. The conditions involving fabric or stone are severe mold, mildew, or fungus.
Chapter 14 details how a person or thing could be restored to cleanliness and return to the community. 

Chapter 15 is a fascinating little read that describes normal and unusual bodily discharges, excluding urine and feces which one would think would be the most impure of the bunch. Again, it’s all about keeping the community, and by extension the Tabernacle, free from any impurities.

It has taken me 5 days to get this posted. Sorry about that.
]]>
<![CDATA[February 15, 2019: Leviticus 8-10, In Which Aaron & Sons Begin Their Priestly Duties with Flameboyance]]>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:28:15 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-15-2019-exodus-8-10-in-which-aaron-sons-begin-their-priestly-duties-with-flameboyanceNow that the Tabernacle is constructed, furnished, and accoutered and instructions for the various sacrifices to be offered there, it is consecrated and the priests are finally ordained to begin their work.

God has chosen Moses’ big brother, Aaron, and Aaron’s four sons to serve as priests in the Tabernacle. Moses officiates though he is not, himself, a priest. As God’s chosen mediator of the Law, Moses transcends all offices and is here the initiator of the religious sect that will many centuries later come to be called Jewish.

The emphasis in the description of the ordination ceremony is on carrying out God’s word (8:5). The first thing that happens, in 8:10-11, is that Moses consecrates the complete Tabernacle as well as those who are to be ordained. The description of this ritual was provided back in Exodus 30:22-30.

Notice that, prior to the ordination ritual, including the priests bathing and dressing, they were consecrated by anointing. 

The entire ordination ritual, down to the priests’ underwear, was already described in Exodus 29 and Leviticus 8 is somewhat of a repetition of that description with some differences. The first difference is, of course, that here the ritual is actually taking place. As previously described, the entire ritual is repeated for seven days, from the bathing and dressing of the priests to the consumption of individual sacrifices offered. 

Clergy everywhere are thankful that ordination ceremonies these days last, typically, only an hour or two and don’t involve being sprinkled and dabbed with fresh blood. 

In chapter 9 the seven day ordination ritual is competed and Aaron and Sons inaugurate their normal priestly duties on the 8th day, just as Creation was completed and normal life began on the 8th day.

Remember how as Moses was receiving the Law on the mountain the people were at the bottom creating their idol? Well no sooner are the priests ordained than Moses’ two older sons, Nadab and Abihu, decide to take things into their own hands. They offered “unholy fire”, more appropriately translated unauthorized. They decided on their own to light up the incense without God’s specific command and God responded by killing them. Don’t mess with God. 

Some might be tempted to point to this text as an example of how the God of the Old Testament is much different from the God of the New Testament. That this God is one of anger and vengeance while the God of the New Testament is one of love and mercy. First, I'd like to point out that God's mercy and love is why the entire lot of them is still alive in the first place. God's patience is unending - in spite of those moments of extreme frustration (see Genesis 18 and Exodus 32 as two examples) in which God decides to just wipe everyone out and start over and is dissuaded by, in these cases, Abraham and Moses. Second, take a peek at Acts 5:1-11. 

God is very serious about the Covenant. Failure to maintain it results in death. It still does, just not usually involving the theatrics displayed in these texts. No, more often our failure to keep God's covenant results in a slow, cancerous death that is more of a process than instantaneous. When we fail to love God by bowing before the idols of our culture and not honoring sabbath laws that envelop all of creation, and when we fail to love others in every possible way, we are cut off from God just as surely as were Nadab and Abihu. 

Since they were priests and therefore holy, and since they had been killed by God’s righteous anger, their bodies could not be touched. Moses enlisted their cousins to carry the corpses, by their clothing, out of the Tabernacle, in fact right out of the camp. We know nothing of what happened after that, whether they were buried or left to rot.

Apparently as a direct result of this incident, there are consequences for the priests. First, they are prohibited, while on duty, from traditional mourning. They have to hold it together and continue to serve God no matter how they may feel on the inside. Whether it’s related to this passage or not, this is still an unwritten expectation within many churches. 

Second, while on duty, no matter what happens, the priests are to go about their duties regardless of what else may occur. Jumping ahead several centuries, in 70AD when the Romans stormed the Temple in Jerusalem, the priests continued to calmly go about their duties and were slaughtered. There are other examples of this type of behavior among the called and ordained throughout faith history. 

Third, God gives instruction directly to Aaron, the only time to do so in Leviticus. While on duty, the priests are to avoid any intoxicants. Does this imply that Nadab and Abihu were lit up when they lit up the incense? Who knows. The priests, as representatives of the people, were the ones to keep track of what was clean or unclean, what was holy and common. They were the ones to keep and teach the laws revealed by God. But they were well cared for – they received a portion of most of the sacrifices for their own consumption, and some they could take home to share with the rest of the family, as long as that place was uncontaminated.

The final little episode in this reading involves Aaron *not* consuming his portion of goat that had been sacrificed but burning it on the altar of burnt offering instead. His excuse was that he was afraid to because of God’s anger over Nadab and Abihu, which seems to be an acceptable reason, “but don’t let it happen again”.

So we’re now on the road with the fully staffed and functioning Tabernacle and the basic rules of living in covenant with God. Of course, people being people, simple rules won’t suffice and amendments follow, sometimes due to boundaries being tested, but often simply as the result of questioning. This is not a blind faith or one that presumes all the answers have already been given. It is very Jewish to ask questions. Indeed, questioning is written into the ritual of remembering the Passover in Exodus 12. 
]]>
<![CDATA[February 14, 2019: Leviticus 5-7, In Which Instructions are Given Concerning Mandatory Sacrifices]]>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:12:16 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-14-2019-exodus-5-7-in-which-instructions-are-given-concerning-mandatory-sacrificesChapter 5 contains four particular cases that either were quite common or, more likely, were unusual. In each of these, it seems that a person does something they don’t realize is wrong. Later, once they feel guilty (in other words, once they figure out they’ve broken God’s law) they can confess and take an offering to the priests. In each of these cases, the offering is to be a female sheep or goat or, if they can’t afford that, a bird or grain offering will suffice. 

Following those four specific cases comes a series of instructions concerning overstepping the bounds of the holy. Again, as above, they may not have realized it at the time and make reparation (to God) once they become aware. The four cases in 6:1-7 at first seem to be about “misappropriating another’s property”. But each case also involves swearing falsely (before God) so reparation to God must be made as well as reparation to the person wronged. Voluntary confession and a wounded conscience seem to be requirements prior to the ritual offering. So three things had to happen: a) the guilty party had to accept responsibility, b) they had to compensate their neighbor and restore the social relationship, and c) through the sacrifice they repaired their relationship with God.

The rest of chapter 6 through the end of chapter 7 involves “How To” instructions on the various kinds of sacrifices. Interesting points are that apparently only the priests wore underwear (6:10). The text makes a point of emphasizing the importance of “putting his linen undergarments” which indicates it was out of the ordinary. It’s also noteworthy that the livelihood of the priests came, at least in part, through these sacrifices. 

A final point to be taken from this text concerns 7:20-21. We’re not talking about being excommunicated here or kicked out of the community. More likely, this may well be “a divine threat to exterminate one’s lineage if one were impure and then deliberately ate sacrificial food.” In a culture for whom having descendants was of great importance this was likely horrifying. I suspect it encouraged people to be careful about what they ate.
]]>
<![CDATA[February 13, 2019: The Beginning of Distraction]]>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:18:29 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-13-2019-the-beginning-of-distraction​Leviticus 1-4: Some sacrifices.

OK, before we start in on these chapters, let’s just take a look at this book as a whole. Exodus has left the community with a lovely big tent for God to stay in any time they’re camped along the route to the Promised Land. While God is in-tent, Moses and/or Aaron can receive divine instruction. Leviticus includes 36 speeches from God to one or both of them addressing various aspects of how the community is to be in covenant with God and, therefore, different from the locals.

The book is divided into two parts with the first part addressing how to use sacred space and keep it holy, and the second part dealing with how to keep the people from looking like the surrounding cultures. It’s all about how to keep God present with the community: if God’s space is defiled, God will leave. If God’s people are defiled, God will leave. 

Objects and people are categorized three ways: clean, unclean, and holy. And there are three kinds of purification rituals. Those that are used one time to establish holy status (ordination of priests, consecration of the Tabernacle); those that are used to maintain holiness (daily sacrifices, annual festivals); and those that are used to repair status (cleansing and repentance sacrifices). Some rituals, like the Day of Atonement, both restore and maintain. 

So what’s the bottom line? For ancient Israelites, the bottom line is that if you want God to stick around, you make sure all the shalts are done and shalt nots are avoided. For Christians, the bottom line is that this is a nice history of where our faith ancestors began but has little to do with how we are to live our lives today. Attempting to enforce these ancient covenant laws as relevant in the Church is to renounce the Messiah. Attempting to enforce these laws as relevant in society at large misses the point: they were for the people of the community, not people outside it. Granted, some of the prohibitions and requirements are common sense. As for the rest, it is unwise to cherry pick among the Levitical laws, choosing some that must be obeyed while conveniently ignoring others. To choose to obey them all requires rejection of the New Testament and a return to animal sacrifice. It’s all or nothing.

++++++++

Chapter 1 lays out details for Burnt Offerings, those sacrifices that are to be completely burnt up (except for the hide) on the big altar in the Tabernacle outer courtyard. As with so many other things, there are three types of burnt offerings: herd (cattle), flock (sheep or goats), and birds. All of them are domestic, and the herd and flock animals must be “males without blemish”, meaning they must be normal, healthy animals. Male animals were much less necessary to daily life than female: only one male is needed to service many females. Some things don’t change. Hence male animals for sacrifices.

The three types are listed in decreasing order of value: cattle are more valuable than sheep or goats which are, in turn, more valuable than birds. The sacrifice offered would depend on what the individual had access to: not everyone had livestock.

So chapter 2 details the Grain Offering, which could substitute for animal offerings especially for the poor. There were several ways grain offerings could be prepared and presented: uncooked, baked, toasted, fried, or roasted.  Raw grain was mixed with oil and frankincense. Other special requirements were to include no leaven but to always include salt. First, no leavening agent (including sourdough) could be included and no “honey” (probably not bee honey, this is probably some kind of fermented jelly made from dates or grapes). Why this prohibition? That has been lost over time. Perhaps the fermentation associated represented decay. Second, “salt of the covenant” was required with all grain offerings. Again, we don’t know why and salt is never mentioned in any covenant ritual anywhere in scripture. Perhaps as a preservative agent salt represented permanence. We just don’t know. And it no longer matters.

Finally, only a portion of any grain offering was actually burnt and the rest was eaten. Any offering classified as “most holy” could only be consumed by the priests.

Moving on, chapter 3 discusses Offerings of Well-Being, variously translated as Peace, Communion, or Covenant Offering. Cattle, sheep, or goats could be offered, this time either male or female, and the same process was used as for burnt offerings except that only the fat, liver, and kidneys were burned on the altar. The remainder was eaten. In fact, there is a command that all big sections of fat belonged to God. Possibly because it burns well and eating too much of it will kill you. As an interesting aside, divination with the liver was popular in other Ancient Near Eastern cultures. So perhaps the liver and kidneys were burned to avoid that temptation.

One more thing on the whole fat topic: 3:17 states unequivocally that *all* fat belongs to YHWH and that no fat or blood is to be consumed. Sorry to lovers of blood sausage and mincemeat if you’re also in that group that thinks Levitical law should still apply. Never mind bacon or shrimp, but that’s later.

Up to now, the sacrifices are all voluntary. Chapter 4 is the first bit of discussion about mandatory sacrifices, those *required* by God. There was an understanding that certain actions, or in some cases failure to act, brought about uncleanness or impurity and would, therefore, threaten the relationship between God and the entire community. My commentary states, “Intentional and unrepented-of sins contaminated the innermost shrine, the Holy of Holies. Communal non-deliberate sins contaminated the outer shrine, while individual non-deliberate sins contaminated the altar of burnt offerings in the courtyard.” The blood splashed around was a sort of ritual detergent.

Chapter 4 mostly deals with unintentional sins by the High Priest, the community as a whole, individual leaders of the community, and individuals. Here, the type of animal to be offered was directly related to the seriousness of the sin. In the case of the sins of the High Priest, none of the sacrifice was saved for human consumption, but neither was it entirely burned on the altar inside the Tabernacle. This has to do with the High Priest’s position as representative of the entire community as well as the amount of uncleanness the sacrifice was seen to have taken on. To ensure that it did not inadvertently contaminate the Tabernacle, it was completely removed and burned outside the camp. This was serious stuff.

These unintentional sins may not even have been realized at the time so once they were known, atonement was made on the sinner’s behalf by the priest.

This section on mandatory sacrifices will go through 6:7.]]>
<![CDATA[February 11-12, 2019: Construction]]>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:11:11 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-11-12-2019-constructionExodus 36-40: The Tabernacle is constructed and God moves in.

Chapters 36-39 describe the construction of the Tabernacle and its furnishings and are, on one hand, a repetition of chapters 25-28. Notice the overwhelming donations of the people: Moses had to start turning people away! And I’m convinced that these donations weren’t “I got a new one, so here’s the old one for the church”. Imagine if we were as generous with our giving! The amount of metals given described at the end of ch 38 is an outrageous pile of loot.

This description of the Tabernacle’s construction includes dimensional detail that God’s instructions didn’t include. It’s kind of like God said, “Build me a tent and here’s kind of what I want it to look like” and Bezalel then drafted up specific blueprints with how long and wide and high it should be, and how many curtains and poles, and exactly how each element was to be constructed. This passage is what is used by those who construct Tabernacle models for those of us who want to get a handle on what this thing might have actually looked like.

In the midst of all this detail, it’s easy for my eyes to glaze over but one verse did jump out: 38:8. Did you notice where the bronze came from that was used for the basin? “from the mirrors of the women who served at the entrance to the tent of meeting.” So! Women were part of the Tabernacle staff! We don’t know what this service at the entrance entailed – it’s been lost to the mythic sands of time. However, we can be sure it wasn’t handing out bulletins. Remember where God conversed with Moses? At the entrance to the tent of meeting. So these women had some kind of significant role, of that we can be fairly sure.

So the construction is completed, under the supervision of Ithamar, Aaron’s No. 4 son. Since I’m quite certain Bezalel and Oholiab didn’t do all of the work themselves, I’m going to assume that Bezalel directed the construction and Oholiab directed the craftspeople in the fine detail work especially of the furnishings and tools.

Once everything is completed, it is all presented to Moses who then blesses the people. 

Then God instructs Moses to set it up on the first day of the first month. This is a full year after the exodus from Egypt and about nine months after they arrived at Mt. Sinai, so, in spite of God’s command to leave that place, they’ve been busy working on the Tabernacle. Now they’re ready to leave. The Tabernacle is set up and we can assume consecrated even though that isn’t stated here. And God moves in. Exodus is done and we’re ready to move on into Leviticus.]]>
<![CDATA[February 10, 2019: The Shining - Bible Version]]>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:39:00 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-10-2019-the-shining-bible-versionExodus 33-35: The Israelites have to leave  Sinai and construct the Tabernacle, new tablets are made, Moses gets all shiny, and all’s well that ends well. For now. That’s a spoiler.

Chapter 32 ended with God telling Moses to get those people out of there. Chapter 33 starts the same way: God gives Moses an eviction notice and says there will be no more God and Hebrew chumminess. God does promise that an angel will guide the people and will drive the Canaanites out of the land. Moses takes this bit of news to the people who immediately “mourned”. They’ve probably been thinking about their decisions around the calf ever since the Levites when sword whacking and Moses went back up to God. Seems they’ve learned their lesson! God’s in an indecisive period now over whether to stay with them or leave it to the angel. 

The people are very repentant and wait anxiously for good news. In an odd passage that seems out of place, Moses and God hang out in a kind of shrine tent outside the camp. The Tabernacle has not yet been built and up to now all of the God : Moses conversations have happened up on the mountain.  At any rate, Moses argues with God over who’s going to travel with the Israelites: an angel or God. Moses’ arguments are similar to the last debate: “What will the locals think of a God who abandons the followers? And God relents.

Moses asks for, and receives, permission to view God. But not face to face because that would kill him. No, from a cave on the mountain Moses can see God’s back. The encounter leaves Moses super shiny and scary to the people. However, the real point to focus on in this passage is the emphasis placed on God’s mercy. 32:6-7 is a snippet of ancient psalm that is repeated or paraphrased numerous times in later scriptures. The focus is on God’s mercy and grace. Note that God’s steadfast love will endure to the thousandth generation but God’s vengeance against sin only to the third and fourth generation. We tend to focus on that 3rd  and 4th generation of guilt more than on the 1000th generation of forgiveness. I think we’d be well placed to reevaluate our focus!

So the Covenant is renewed (phew!) and God again emphasizes the commands to serve no other gods, to have no idols, and to honor the Sabbath, with a few other reminders sprinkled in. These three requirements are massive. I have to wonder if the state of the Church today has something to do with our collective and individual failure to keep these commands. This is, after all, what it means to love God, right? 

Finally, God dictates a new set of tablets to Moses. Here’s an interesting point – in 34:1 God says, “I will write on the tablets the words that were on the former tablets.” But in 34:27 God says, “Write these words…” Notice: Last time GOD personally inscribed the tablets (31:18). This time Moses does the writing. It emphasizes that there remains a crack in the relationship between God and the Israelites.

Chapter 35 begins with Moses going over God’s instructions with the people. Remember, because of the mess created because of the calf, he hasn’t yet told them about the Tabernacle. Moses starts out with a reminder of the Sabbath rest. See how key this is?

Now Moses make the request for materials listed back in 25:1-9 from whomever “is of a generous heart”. And they did! “So they came, both men and women, all who were of a willing heart …. Everyone who could make an offering” (35:22,24). Wow! Imagine getting enough to construct a church along with all the furnishings and tools just from the willingness of the hearts of the people! No fundraising, no campaigns, no funky painted thermometer in the yard, just generous hearts.

God has already commissioned Bezalel and Oholiab, now Moses gets to pass that on to everyone. 

Tune in next time when Bezalel and Oholiab take over the engineering department. 
]]>
<![CDATA[February 9, 2019: Party Time]]>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:45:20 GMThttp://mulberrycreekcsa.com/gails-blog-contemplative-wanderer/february-9-2019-party-timeExodus 30-32: Moses receives the final instructions while Aaron has a moment of fickleness.

Chapter 30 and 31 wind up YHWH’s instructions to Moses for construction of the Tabernacle. Moses and Joshua are still on the mountain – this is the end of those 40 days mentioned back in 24:18. On the one hand, it seems that none of the Tabernacle building or priest ordaining has happened yet. On the other hand, it seems as if it has already begun. This is because of those different traditions being interwoven and written down hundreds of years after the fact.

Let me just take a brief side trip about the idea that Moses, himself, did not write down all these stories. As much as tradition attributes the first five books of the Bible to him, there is no where in scripture that says Moses wrote any more than the odd poem. Moses received instructions, Moses received the law over a period of time, but no where does it say that Moses ever wrote a book. If he had, there would have been instructions for writing the Torah scroll, for storage, handling, and transportation of it. The fact that there is zero mention of any such instructions goes a very long way to say that this was all orally transmitted. For people living in a culture dependent on remembering through writing, this is a difficult concept to grasp, but oral cultures did, and still do, an exceptional job of relaying information and stories from one generation to the next without ever writing down a single stroke. If nothing else, the power of the Spirit of God finds nothing impossible. Here’s a decent article on the subject if you want the Jewish perspective on it.

Back to the mountain. So here we receive the last bits of instruction of Tabernacle furnishings in the altar of incense, which was a second altar that would be inside the tent (the altar of burnt offering was out in the courtyard – it had to be or the tent would have been destroyed) for the twice daily burning of incense.

After the altar of incense is described there’s an odd insert that seems would be more appropriate elsewhere. Nonetheless, here it is. A census was to be taken (eventually) and every man age 22 and up would be required to pay a tax to support the Tabernacle. Scripture does not say what exactly this support consisted of since the priests were fed from the sacrifices and the accouterments had been donated. We can take a guess that all that packing and unpacking and daily wear and tear would require repairs from time to time. Although the initial materials were donated, there is no mention that any materials used for repair or replacement would be likewise donated. Just taking a stab at a guess here. 

Back to furniture instructions with the bathtub. Although there is no dimension given, this bronze basin would have been big enough to allow for the priests to be able to bathe (hands and feet) prior to and after their work in the Tabernacle. I’m not going to go into the euphemistic use of the word “feet” in the Bible. You can look it up. But every time you see something going on with someone’s feet you have to wonder which feet we’re talking about. Sometimes it was actually feet – the ones at the bottom of the legs that do the walking and standing. Sometimes not.
The instructions wind down with recipes for anointing oil and incense. Both of these are specifically and only to be used for Tabernacle service. Interestingly, anyone using either of these, or a mix even similar to them, was to be excommunicated.

Chapter 31 introduces two artisans: Bezalel and Oholiab, who are filled with “divine spirit”, and will be the engineers of the Tabernacle project.
God’s instructions for the Tabernacle wind up with a re-emphasis of the Sabbath law as “a sign between me and you throughout your generations.” It’s an important piece of the Covenant that is often overlooked for more graphic images. However, this text very clearly states that “everyone who profanes [the Sabbath] shall be put to death; whoever does any work on it shall be cut off from among the people.” If certain sects of current society spent more time on the Sabbath laws (except for the putting to death part) and less time on other activities listed elsewhere in scripture and with less frequency, the world would be a better place and the Church would be much healthier. 

By the way: thus far there has been zero mention of sexual sin except that sexual activity makes one unclean for worship. The Ten Commandments say nothing, except the command not to covet, which is not a physical act. The Book of the Covenant says nothing except that bit about a man seducing a virgin paying her father the bride-price, which is about property rights, not sex. 

See, here’s the thing. People get their ax ground over activities they find listed in the Bible as sinful that *they* have no interest in performing and very conveniently dismiss any sinful activity that interferes with their own practice. Like violating the Sabbath, as just one example. 

Chapter 1 ends with God passing over to Moses a pair of tablets on which God had recorded the covenant. Traditionally, this is understood as being the Ten Commandments, but the text doesn’t say just what was on those two tablets. Moses’ long one on one retreat with YHWH is done and it’s time for him to return to the bottom of the mountain. 

Chapter 32 tells us what has been going on in the meantime at the foot of the mountain. My bet is that the Back to Egypt Committee is behind this whole thing but the text doesn’t say who instigated this latest episode. Moses has been on the mountain a long time. Long enough that the people got tired of waiting. And they were bored. And now we have to ask, “Aaron! What were you thinking!” Who knows, really. It is very clear, however, that Aaron messes up and in a big way. With Moses’ increased delay in returning, the people demand gods from Aaron and he makes them a golden calf and sets a festival for the next day. Yes, Aaron does this. Why? We can only speculate. Maybe he was afraid of the crowds. Maybe he, too, had lost faith that Moses was ever coming back. Whatever his reason, Aaron takes some of the loot plundered from the Egyptians and makes a calf of gold. The calf or bull was one of the most popular and prominent pagan idols in the Ancient Near East, one with which the people would have been very familiar. It symbolized, among other things, fertility and the ruckus that breaks out is described in terms that indicate some kind of orgy was going on. 

Up on the mountain, God says, “By the way, Moses, those people down there who have covenanted with me have broken their covenant. I’m going to wipe them out and start over with you.” Moses reminds God that a) the Egyptians will thing God’s a patsy, and b) God covenanted with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that *their* descendants would multiply, so please don’t just exterminate them for this lapse. Moses perhaps reminds God that the Israelites have not had time to establish a real understanding and practice of the covenant. Whatever the argument, God changes God’s mind. See? Intercessory prayer can have amazing results. 

So Moses heads down the mountain, stone tablets in hand, along with Joshua. Joshua apparently has not been privy to the conversation between Moses and God and thinks war has broken out. Moses is quick to correct him and, as a symbol of the Covenant being broken, smashes the tablets! He then confronts Aaron who replies, “Calf? What calf? Oh. This calf. Well, I’ll tell you. I put jewelry into the fire and this calf just jumped out!” 

Moses calls everyone on God’s side to gather with him and the Levites are the only ones to respond. Moses then, disturbingly, has them take their swords to the rest. Scripture tells us 3000 were slain and we know that there were waaaaay more than 3000 folks in the remaining 11 tribes. Besides – if everyone else had been slain, well … do the genetic math there. This is one of those head-scratcher passages and, really, it isn’t worth trying to dissect it. We just know that God was pissed, Moses eased the tension a bit; but the Covenant had been broken and the consequences are dire. 

The next day, Moses, once again (I’ve lost count at this point – 8?) climbs the mountain. This time he asks God to allow him, Moses, to atone for the sin of the people. God’s not having it, though – this is not a communal matter, it’s an individual one. God sends them packing from Sinai but promises an angel to lead them. Not God, now, God’s angel. God’s still simmering. 
]]>